Experiments can take place to determine if a product or idea will work as intended. Those who support this legal practice say that it is for a good cause, implying that it is better to use animals than human beings for testing. Most animals, once the testing process has been completed, are euthanized.
This is because they carefully choose animals whose rights do not fall under the jurisdiction of the AWA. There are also various computer simulations that would allow us to recreate the effects of a drug without having to involve a living creature of any kind.
With no direct societal benefit produced, what is the benefit of an animal suffering from the testing process. And because animal experimentations are being regulated by the committee that is selected by the facility itself, animal subjects are even put at a bigger risk of being treated poorly for their entire existence.
It enhances the safety of the products being released. Some of the most beneficial things that have come from medical testing on animals are Penicillin, various asthma treatments, and insulin. What about the use of computer models. Selection bias was a major problem, but even with randomization and blinding technique used, proper selection of animals still failed.
Because it cannot be fully replaced by computer simulations or models, the argument is that live testing will continue to be needed.
The product may harm or benefit the animal, but not a human. There is also the possibility that poor research practices could create false positive data that could then place human lives at risk. Animal testing provides quite a few benefits to the human race.
Feb 7, -Flow Psychology Editor. That means animals will likely be sacrificing their lives to determine the safety of a product that a human will never even know was being developed.
Countless medical treatments have been developed through the use of animal testing. There are alternatives to animal experimentation that are considered viable, such cell cultures in a petri dish and in vitro testing, which can even produce more relevant results than those from vivisection.
Pros of Animal Research To begin, research using animals may lead to new medications being discovered. As only over 1 million animals are covered by the AWA as ofaround 25 million more are left unprotected from abuse and mistreatment.
It may not offer valid results.
The animal which shares the most similar patterns for diabetes is a cat; cats who become overweight do indeed become predisposed to the same kind of diabetes that humans do in the same situation. Plus, even different species of animals may not have the same reactions.
What Are the Cons of Animal Research. This fact has caused multiple groups to come forward in protest of this type of testing. Caring for an animal requires a large investment. If funds and resources are focused on animal-free alternatives, more humane, ethical and inexpensive solutions.
Given that there are both pros and cons of the animal experimentation procedures, it is your decision whether you should be supporting this kind of experimentations or not. It uses animals that are identical to humans in some way.
Now multiple those costs over an entire laboratory and the cost of animal research becomes very high, very quickly. Poor research practices invalidate the data obtained. This is why animal testing is endorsed by the American Veterinary Medical Association. Pros of Animal Research To begin, research using animals may lead to new medications being discovered.
Examples of medications that have been the result of animal testing are Penicillin, several asthma treatments, cancer and HIV drugs, vaccines, antibiotics, and insulin.
Read pros and cons in the debate. U NDERSTAND T HE I SSUES. U NDERSTAND E ACH O THER. Menu Toggle navigation. Animal research is highly regulated, with laws in place to protect animals from mistreatment.
89% of scientists surveyed by the Pew Research Center were in favor of animal testing for scientific research. 10 Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation Millions of animals are being used for experiments in the US each year.
Those who support this legal practice say that it is for a good cause, implying that it is better to use animals than human beings for testing. The pros and cons of animal research will always be controversial.
Testing animals to see if a product is safe may be better than testing humans first, but that also means the life of an animal is devalued. Pros and Cons of Animal Experimentation Scientists and various experts have been discovering things that can be used by humans with different health issues, and to prove whether their discoveries are effective for human use, they would usually make animal experimentations first.
Pros and Cons of Animal Testing Animal testing is used in many different industries, mainly medical and cosmetic. Animals are used in order to ensure the products are safe for the use of humans.Pros and cons of animal research